Review



membrane er marker  (Addgene inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Addgene inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Addgene inc membrane er marker
    Membrane Er Marker, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 81 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/membrane er marker/product/Addgene inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 81 article reviews
    membrane er marker - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    94
    Addgene inc membrane er marker
    Membrane Er Marker, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/membrane er marker/product/Addgene inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    membrane er marker - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Abcam anti calnexin antibody er membrane marker
    Anti Calnexin Antibody Er Membrane Marker, supplied by Abcam, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti calnexin antibody er membrane marker/product/Abcam
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti calnexin antibody er membrane marker - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Addgene inc er membrane marker
    Er Membrane Marker, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/er membrane marker/product/Addgene inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    er membrane marker - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Enzo Biochem anti-calnexin (er membrane marker protein)
    Anti Calnexin (Er Membrane Marker Protein), supplied by Enzo Biochem, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti-calnexin (er membrane marker protein)/product/Enzo Biochem
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti-calnexin (er membrane marker protein) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    TaKaRa er membrane marker cfp er
    Receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling is restricted to the front of migrating leader cells. (a,b) bFGF-induced tyrosine phosphorylation was higher in the front of migrating cells (white arrows). Addition of the pan-RTK inhibitor Ponatinib blocked tyrosine kinase signaling in the front, but not in the back of leader cells. Follower cells did not respond to bFGF. HUVECs were fixed and stained with pY20 anti-phospho-tyrosine antibody (n = 107, 105, 115, 110 and 107 cells for SFM, follower cells, and Ponatinib 0 nM, 25 nM and 100 nM, respectively). SFM: serum-free medium. (c,e) Fluorescence ratio images of leader cells co-expressing YFP-Akt-PH (PIP 3 sensor) or YFP-C1AC1A (DAG sensor) and a <t>plasma</t> <t>membrane</t> marker <t>(CFP-mCD4).</t> PIP 3 (c) and DAG (e) were enriched in the front of migrating cells. (d,f) Front-to-back gradients of PIP 3 and DAG were present in leader, but not follower cells (24 leader and 42 follower cells in (d) , 28 and 62 cells in (f) ). (g) Ca 2+ pulses in migrating HUVECs were measured as relative increases in local PM targeted GCaMP6s fluorescence intensity. Higher activities were observed in the front (#1) compared to the middle (#2) or back (#3) of migrating cells. (h) Relative mean amplitudes of local Ca 2+ fluctuations measured over 3 minutes in the front of migrating cells in response to serum or serum plus Ponatinib (see also ). Amplitudes of Ca 2+ fluctuations were normalized to basal cytosolic levels (0.3 R.U. means the fluctuation is 30% of the average cytosolic [Ca 2+ ] level; n = 24 cells). (i,j) Migrating HUVECs expressing GCaMP6s-CAAX and the reference membrane marker mCD4 were used to measure Ca 2+ gradients in leader and follower cells (n = 83 leader and n = 86 follower cells). Bars denote mean ± SEM in Fig. 1b,h. Student t test was used for Fig. 1b,d,f,h,j. In Fig. 1d,f,j, p values were calculated by comparing the ratio of the sensor / PM intensity ratios in the front and back (both regions were 10% of cell length).
    Er Membrane Marker Cfp Er, supplied by TaKaRa, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/er membrane marker cfp er/product/TaKaRa
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    er membrane marker cfp er - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Thermo Fisher mouse anti-dpm1 (marker for er and nuclear membrane-er network)
    Heme oxygenase-1 translocates to the (peri)nuclear region in response to H2O2. A, confocal microscopy images of HA-tagged Hmx1p cells treated with 4 mm H2O2 for 6 h and then stained as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Arrows denote areas (white) that show staining with all three markers, DAPI (blue), anti-HA (green), and ER marker DiOC6(3) (red), indicating (peri)nuclear localization of Hmx1p. Scale bars 10 or 5 μm, as indicated. B, quantification of the experiments shown in A. The extent of (peri)nuclear localization of Hmx1-HAp (open bars) and HA-Hmx1p (closed bars) in H2O2-treated cells was compared by counting cells that displayed distinctive (peri)nuclear staning, as assessed by acquisition and analysis of z-stacks taken of >1,000 cells for each of two separate experiments. C, cells were treated as in A, followed by cell fractionation into cytosolic (C) and nuclear fraction (N), and Western blotting using antibodies directed against HA (Hmx1p), Pgk1 (cytosol), Nop2 (nucleus), Dpm1p (ER), and Kar2 (ER). The results shown are representative of three separate experiments. D, quantification of the data obtained in C. The extent of (peri)nuclear/ER-localized Hmx1-HAp (open bars) and HA-Hmx1p (closed bars) in cells treated with H2O2 (4 mm, 6 h) was assessed by determining the respective density ratios of Hmx1p to either Nop2, <t>Dpm1,</t> or Kar2 from three separate experiments using ImageJ, with the value for the respective ratio for Hmx1-HAp set at 1. *, p < 0.05 compared with corresponding Hmx1-HAp (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test).
    Mouse Anti Dpm1 (Marker For Er And Nuclear Membrane Er Network), supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti-dpm1 (marker for er and nuclear membrane-er network)/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti-dpm1 (marker for er and nuclear membrane-er network) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling is restricted to the front of migrating leader cells. (a,b) bFGF-induced tyrosine phosphorylation was higher in the front of migrating cells (white arrows). Addition of the pan-RTK inhibitor Ponatinib blocked tyrosine kinase signaling in the front, but not in the back of leader cells. Follower cells did not respond to bFGF. HUVECs were fixed and stained with pY20 anti-phospho-tyrosine antibody (n = 107, 105, 115, 110 and 107 cells for SFM, follower cells, and Ponatinib 0 nM, 25 nM and 100 nM, respectively). SFM: serum-free medium. (c,e) Fluorescence ratio images of leader cells co-expressing YFP-Akt-PH (PIP 3 sensor) or YFP-C1AC1A (DAG sensor) and a plasma membrane marker (CFP-mCD4). PIP 3 (c) and DAG (e) were enriched in the front of migrating cells. (d,f) Front-to-back gradients of PIP 3 and DAG were present in leader, but not follower cells (24 leader and 42 follower cells in (d) , 28 and 62 cells in (f) ). (g) Ca 2+ pulses in migrating HUVECs were measured as relative increases in local PM targeted GCaMP6s fluorescence intensity. Higher activities were observed in the front (#1) compared to the middle (#2) or back (#3) of migrating cells. (h) Relative mean amplitudes of local Ca 2+ fluctuations measured over 3 minutes in the front of migrating cells in response to serum or serum plus Ponatinib (see also ). Amplitudes of Ca 2+ fluctuations were normalized to basal cytosolic levels (0.3 R.U. means the fluctuation is 30% of the average cytosolic [Ca 2+ ] level; n = 24 cells). (i,j) Migrating HUVECs expressing GCaMP6s-CAAX and the reference membrane marker mCD4 were used to measure Ca 2+ gradients in leader and follower cells (n = 83 leader and n = 86 follower cells). Bars denote mean ± SEM in Fig. 1b,h. Student t test was used for Fig. 1b,d,f,h,j. In Fig. 1d,f,j, p values were calculated by comparing the ratio of the sensor / PM intensity ratios in the front and back (both regions were 10% of cell length).

    Journal: Nature cell biology

    Article Title: A polarized Ca 2+ , diacylglycerol, and STIM1 signaling system regulates directed cell migration

    doi: 10.1038/ncb2906

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling is restricted to the front of migrating leader cells. (a,b) bFGF-induced tyrosine phosphorylation was higher in the front of migrating cells (white arrows). Addition of the pan-RTK inhibitor Ponatinib blocked tyrosine kinase signaling in the front, but not in the back of leader cells. Follower cells did not respond to bFGF. HUVECs were fixed and stained with pY20 anti-phospho-tyrosine antibody (n = 107, 105, 115, 110 and 107 cells for SFM, follower cells, and Ponatinib 0 nM, 25 nM and 100 nM, respectively). SFM: serum-free medium. (c,e) Fluorescence ratio images of leader cells co-expressing YFP-Akt-PH (PIP 3 sensor) or YFP-C1AC1A (DAG sensor) and a plasma membrane marker (CFP-mCD4). PIP 3 (c) and DAG (e) were enriched in the front of migrating cells. (d,f) Front-to-back gradients of PIP 3 and DAG were present in leader, but not follower cells (24 leader and 42 follower cells in (d) , 28 and 62 cells in (f) ). (g) Ca 2+ pulses in migrating HUVECs were measured as relative increases in local PM targeted GCaMP6s fluorescence intensity. Higher activities were observed in the front (#1) compared to the middle (#2) or back (#3) of migrating cells. (h) Relative mean amplitudes of local Ca 2+ fluctuations measured over 3 minutes in the front of migrating cells in response to serum or serum plus Ponatinib (see also ). Amplitudes of Ca 2+ fluctuations were normalized to basal cytosolic levels (0.3 R.U. means the fluctuation is 30% of the average cytosolic [Ca 2+ ] level; n = 24 cells). (i,j) Migrating HUVECs expressing GCaMP6s-CAAX and the reference membrane marker mCD4 were used to measure Ca 2+ gradients in leader and follower cells (n = 83 leader and n = 86 follower cells). Bars denote mean ± SEM in Fig. 1b,h. Student t test was used for Fig. 1b,d,f,h,j. In Fig. 1d,f,j, p values were calculated by comparing the ratio of the sensor / PM intensity ratios in the front and back (both regions were 10% of cell length).

    Article Snippet: The ER membrane marker CFP-ER was made by ligating the transmembrane domain of STIM1 to the N-terminus of CFP in pECFP-N1 (Clontech).

    Techniques: Staining, Fluorescence, Expressing, Marker

    STIM1 is enriched in the front of migrating cells. (a,b) Migrating HUVEC expressed YFP-STIM1 (STIM1) and a CFP-tagged ER marker (ER). Merged and ratio images are shown here and in to show the relative enrichment of STIM1 compared to an ER marker towards the front. White arrow indicates the direction of cell migration. (b) Quantification of the ratio of YFP-STIM1 / CFP-ER marker from front to back (see Methods ). YFP-STIM1 was enriched in the front, whereas (c) the control YFP-ER was not (n = 36 cells per condition). (d–f) Enrichment of STIM1 in the front of migrating cells is mediated by binding to the microtubule plus-end binding protein EB1. (d) Domain structure of STIM1 and mutations preventing binding to EB1. (e) Unlike wild-type STIM1 (S1wt) protein (Fig. 4a,b and ), the S1NN mutant was not enriched in the front of migrating cells. (n = 27 cells) (f) Over-expression of the S1NN mutant suppressed cell migration less than overexpression of S1wt. Bars are mean ± SEM (n ~ 10,000 cells per condition).

    Journal: Nature cell biology

    Article Title: A polarized Ca 2+ , diacylglycerol, and STIM1 signaling system regulates directed cell migration

    doi: 10.1038/ncb2906

    Figure Lengend Snippet: STIM1 is enriched in the front of migrating cells. (a,b) Migrating HUVEC expressed YFP-STIM1 (STIM1) and a CFP-tagged ER marker (ER). Merged and ratio images are shown here and in to show the relative enrichment of STIM1 compared to an ER marker towards the front. White arrow indicates the direction of cell migration. (b) Quantification of the ratio of YFP-STIM1 / CFP-ER marker from front to back (see Methods ). YFP-STIM1 was enriched in the front, whereas (c) the control YFP-ER was not (n = 36 cells per condition). (d–f) Enrichment of STIM1 in the front of migrating cells is mediated by binding to the microtubule plus-end binding protein EB1. (d) Domain structure of STIM1 and mutations preventing binding to EB1. (e) Unlike wild-type STIM1 (S1wt) protein (Fig. 4a,b and ), the S1NN mutant was not enriched in the front of migrating cells. (n = 27 cells) (f) Over-expression of the S1NN mutant suppressed cell migration less than overexpression of S1wt. Bars are mean ± SEM (n ~ 10,000 cells per condition).

    Article Snippet: The ER membrane marker CFP-ER was made by ligating the transmembrane domain of STIM1 to the N-terminus of CFP in pECFP-N1 (Clontech).

    Techniques: Marker, Migration, Binding Assay, Mutagenesis, Over Expression

    STIM1 is locally activated in the front of migrating cells. (a) HUVEC cells were co-transfected with YFP-STIM1 and the ER-PM junction marker CFP-ER-PM. Confocal images show focal planes at the bottom of the cell. The white arrow marks the direction of migration.YFP-STIM1 was enriched at front ER-PM junctions in migrating cells. (b) Quantification of the ratio of YFP-STIM1 / CFP-ER-PM from front to back in migrating cells. (n =14 cells) (c,d) Similar analysis as in (b) but for cells coexpressing YFP-S1NN and CFP-ER-PM (c) or coexpressing YFP-ER-PM and CFP-ER-PM. A smaller increase in relative S1NN activity was observed in the front (n = 10 cells for S1NN and n = 12 cells for the control group). (e,f) Decreasing luminal ER Ca 2+ levels towards the front of migrating leader cells. (e) Ratio-imaging of a modified luminal ER Ca 2+ FRET probe T1ER (see Methods ) in migrating HUVECs. Adding the SERCA inhibitor thapsigargin (2 μM) and EGTA (3 mM) decreased ER Ca 2+ levels (lower panel). (f) Gradient in luminal ER Ca 2+ measured using the T1ER probe. Note that the lower Ca 2+ levels in the front are still sensitive to EGTA+thapsigargin treatment (n = 79 cells for the control group; n = 49 cells for the thapsigargin + EGTA group).

    Journal: Nature cell biology

    Article Title: A polarized Ca 2+ , diacylglycerol, and STIM1 signaling system regulates directed cell migration

    doi: 10.1038/ncb2906

    Figure Lengend Snippet: STIM1 is locally activated in the front of migrating cells. (a) HUVEC cells were co-transfected with YFP-STIM1 and the ER-PM junction marker CFP-ER-PM. Confocal images show focal planes at the bottom of the cell. The white arrow marks the direction of migration.YFP-STIM1 was enriched at front ER-PM junctions in migrating cells. (b) Quantification of the ratio of YFP-STIM1 / CFP-ER-PM from front to back in migrating cells. (n =14 cells) (c,d) Similar analysis as in (b) but for cells coexpressing YFP-S1NN and CFP-ER-PM (c) or coexpressing YFP-ER-PM and CFP-ER-PM. A smaller increase in relative S1NN activity was observed in the front (n = 10 cells for S1NN and n = 12 cells for the control group). (e,f) Decreasing luminal ER Ca 2+ levels towards the front of migrating leader cells. (e) Ratio-imaging of a modified luminal ER Ca 2+ FRET probe T1ER (see Methods ) in migrating HUVECs. Adding the SERCA inhibitor thapsigargin (2 μM) and EGTA (3 mM) decreased ER Ca 2+ levels (lower panel). (f) Gradient in luminal ER Ca 2+ measured using the T1ER probe. Note that the lower Ca 2+ levels in the front are still sensitive to EGTA+thapsigargin treatment (n = 79 cells for the control group; n = 49 cells for the thapsigargin + EGTA group).

    Article Snippet: The ER membrane marker CFP-ER was made by ligating the transmembrane domain of STIM1 to the N-terminus of CFP in pECFP-N1 (Clontech).

    Techniques: Transfection, Marker, Migration, Activity Assay, Imaging, Modification

    Heme oxygenase-1 translocates to the (peri)nuclear region in response to H2O2. A, confocal microscopy images of HA-tagged Hmx1p cells treated with 4 mm H2O2 for 6 h and then stained as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Arrows denote areas (white) that show staining with all three markers, DAPI (blue), anti-HA (green), and ER marker DiOC6(3) (red), indicating (peri)nuclear localization of Hmx1p. Scale bars 10 or 5 μm, as indicated. B, quantification of the experiments shown in A. The extent of (peri)nuclear localization of Hmx1-HAp (open bars) and HA-Hmx1p (closed bars) in H2O2-treated cells was compared by counting cells that displayed distinctive (peri)nuclear staning, as assessed by acquisition and analysis of z-stacks taken of >1,000 cells for each of two separate experiments. C, cells were treated as in A, followed by cell fractionation into cytosolic (C) and nuclear fraction (N), and Western blotting using antibodies directed against HA (Hmx1p), Pgk1 (cytosol), Nop2 (nucleus), Dpm1p (ER), and Kar2 (ER). The results shown are representative of three separate experiments. D, quantification of the data obtained in C. The extent of (peri)nuclear/ER-localized Hmx1-HAp (open bars) and HA-Hmx1p (closed bars) in cells treated with H2O2 (4 mm, 6 h) was assessed by determining the respective density ratios of Hmx1p to either Nop2, Dpm1, or Kar2 from three separate experiments using ImageJ, with the value for the respective ratio for Hmx1-HAp set at 1. *, p < 0.05 compared with corresponding Hmx1-HAp (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test).

    Journal: The Journal of Biological Chemistry

    Article Title: The Yeast Homolog of Heme Oxygenase-1 Affords Cellular Antioxidant Protection via the Transcriptional Regulation of Known Antioxidant Genes *

    doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.187062

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Heme oxygenase-1 translocates to the (peri)nuclear region in response to H2O2. A, confocal microscopy images of HA-tagged Hmx1p cells treated with 4 mm H2O2 for 6 h and then stained as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Arrows denote areas (white) that show staining with all three markers, DAPI (blue), anti-HA (green), and ER marker DiOC6(3) (red), indicating (peri)nuclear localization of Hmx1p. Scale bars 10 or 5 μm, as indicated. B, quantification of the experiments shown in A. The extent of (peri)nuclear localization of Hmx1-HAp (open bars) and HA-Hmx1p (closed bars) in H2O2-treated cells was compared by counting cells that displayed distinctive (peri)nuclear staning, as assessed by acquisition and analysis of z-stacks taken of >1,000 cells for each of two separate experiments. C, cells were treated as in A, followed by cell fractionation into cytosolic (C) and nuclear fraction (N), and Western blotting using antibodies directed against HA (Hmx1p), Pgk1 (cytosol), Nop2 (nucleus), Dpm1p (ER), and Kar2 (ER). The results shown are representative of three separate experiments. D, quantification of the data obtained in C. The extent of (peri)nuclear/ER-localized Hmx1-HAp (open bars) and HA-Hmx1p (closed bars) in cells treated with H2O2 (4 mm, 6 h) was assessed by determining the respective density ratios of Hmx1p to either Nop2, Dpm1, or Kar2 from three separate experiments using ImageJ, with the value for the respective ratio for Hmx1-HAp set at 1. *, p < 0.05 compared with corresponding Hmx1-HAp (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test).

    Article Snippet: Blots were incubated with either mouse monoclonal anti-HA (to localize Hmx1p) (Sigma, 1:5,000 dilution), rat anti-tubulin (loading control) (Abcam, 1:5,000), mouse anti-Pgk1 (cytosol marker) (Invitrogen, 1:5,000), mouse anti-Nop2 (nucleus marker) (Abcam, 1:5,000), mouse anti-Dpm1 (marker for ER and nuclear membrane-ER network) (Molecular Probes, 1:500) or rabbit anti-Kar2 antibody (ER marker) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 1:1,000), and bound antibody visualized by chemiluminescence (ECL, Amersham Biosciences) following incubation with sheep anti-mouse immunoglobulin-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (Amersham Biosciences, 1:5,000), sheep anti-rat immunoglobulin-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (Sigma, 1:5,000), or goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (Abcam, 1:5,000).

    Techniques: Confocal Microscopy, Staining, Marker, Cell Fractionation, Western Blot